No need to argue, no need to justify anything. You need to listen carefully and think about how you can use the situation for the benefit of the case. Even if I disagree, there is no need to argue. Say, "all right, all right, let's think."
Arguing over some idea is primarily necessary for its architect. It's only an argument that can demonstrate all its weak and controversial points. An argument makes it possible to polish the diamond of the idea into a valuable jewel.
Loving communication is a criterion of knowledge. If there is no love between people, they will argue, generating differences between them, i.e. form, i.e. lies. The truth isn't born in an argument, only a lie is born in an argument.
The meaning of a pile of sand is to bring the General to the particular, to make one of the many. When you have a square in your hands and your opponent has a circle, you can argue until you are hoarse which one of you is right. You will endlessly beat your head against the wall, proving which of you is right. Than Messrs. idealists and engage in entire life. Proving other people that they are right and others are wrong. That is why idealists live in hell, that is why the life of idealists is sad. The world is not perfect, it hurts them. Fans of squares suffer, seeing the circle. Circle lovers go crazy when they see a square. Syntalism proposes to destroy the square and the circle, turning them into piles of sand, and then it will be seen that these are two identical piles, and there is no subject for dispute.